I have written previously about how you need to be careful when it comes to running a video or audio recorder in your car. A few non-believers always chime in to say I am paranoid. No, I am an attorney.
Consider the case of the Uber driver who filmed his encounter with the seemingly-drunk man in his back seat. The one who was pummeling him before the driver pulled out the pepper spray. Now the man in the backseat is suing the man in the front seat for $5 Million.
The altercation took place in California, where there is an eavesdropping statute. That statute requires the consent of “all” parties for a recording to be made.
Don’t get me wrong. I am not saying you should be able to assault Uber drivers when you are drunk.
Nor am I saying this man will win his lawsuit.
But I am saying it might have helped the driver if he had not publicized the existence of this tape so widely. He could have just sat on it and pulled it out later to defend himself if need be. But if he hadn’t gone on and youtubed it, he probably wouldn’t have gotten sued.
Follow me on Twitter: @stevelehto
Hear my podcast on iTunes: Lehto’s Law
Steve Lehto has been practicing law for 24 years, almost exclusively in consumer protection and Michigan lemon law. He wrote The Lemon Law Bible and Chrysler’s Turbine Car: The Rise and Fall of Detroit’s Coolest Creation.
This website may supply general information about the law but it is for informational purposes only. This does not create an attorney-client relationship and is not meant to constitute legal advice, so the good news is we’re not billing you by the hour for reading this. The bad news is that you shouldn’t act upon any of the information without consulting a qualified professional attorney who will, probably, bill you by the hour.