I’m taking my lead off of a Kotaku (gasp) article regarding price point for multiplayer only games. Feel free to continue if interested.

The article posits that multiplayer only games shouldn’t be charging full price when you’re essentially not getting full features. And some expect additional payments for future content. To me if it’s not worth it people won’t pay for it.

Maybe I’m old fashioned but I honestly prefer a single player experience to a multiplayer one. I maybe get into one multiplayer game per year, because of the commitment it takes to get competent and stay competent. However with single player I can play at my leisure. And I can come back to it when I wish. This brings me in a really round about way to my leading image. If that game was MP only, I couldnt go back now and drop some Tangos. RIP Rainbow Six.