This is a platform for User Generated Content. G/O Media assumes no liability for content posted by Kinja users to this platform.

Supreme Court ruling on consent to blood tests

I just read this story on Jalopnik about the ruling in Mitchell v. Wisconsin saying police can order a blood test on an unconscious person without their prior consent. Of course, the article is written by Aaron Gordon as a screed against Republican judges trying to steam roll our civil liberties. But I’d like an analysis from our legal minds here in place of one from a blogger with an axe to grind.

Any of our lawyer contingent here want to venture an opinion?


Share This Story

Get our newsletter