This is a platform for User Generated Content. G/O Media assumes no liability for content posted by Kinja users to this platform.

the effects of retroactive brand loyalty

Came across some interesting cars while browsing the local Craigslist.

First off, we have a 1990 Pontiac Grand Prix Turbo:

Advertisement

Everyone knows the GNX, but few realize that ASC/McClaren also worked with GM on turbocharging another car in that era - the Pontiac Grand Prix. And while the engine is inferior to the Buick 3800 and the front-wheel drive chassis couldn’t handle GNX power if it wanted to, even with some work needed it seems like a steal given a $1,200 asking price.

Next, we have a 1985 Subaru RX:

Advertisement

By all means, a cool car. But at $5,000, this Leone “pre-cursor to the WRX” proves that there is a bubble in Subaru cars in general. Unlike the Grand Prix, the motor has already blown and been swapped in the Subaru. The Subaru does have 4WD, but let’s be clear - this isn’t Subaru’s AWD system. This is a FWD car like the Grand Prix in all but loose surface situations.

Both are rare cars, so why the $3,800 price difference? Condition is obviously a factor, but ultimately I’d speculate that it comes down to, at least local people, having some halo around the Subaru brand and some negative stigma around domestics outside of trucks/SUVs/Mustangs.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter