Hot take: Nissan has always done what Toyota has done, but worse.

Illustration for article titled Why are Nissan so shit

The Crown killed the Cedric

The CH-R is here, the Juke is dead or dying

The Patrol plays second fiddle to Land Cruiser

The Hilux kills the Navara

Nobody would buy a Pulsar/Tiida/whatever over a Corolla

Yaris destroys the Micra

Camry destroys Maxima

Hiace beats the...Nomad? What’s Nissan’s van even called?

Not quite a fair comparison, but the Prius is destroying the Leaf probably losing to Rav 4? Or Kluger? Maybe it’s best we don’t delve into the absurd SUV market.


I’m sure the Elgrand is beat down by the Vellfire/Alphard too. Let’s not even mention the Tarago.

You don’t even need to point out specific models to compare Lexus to Infiniti. Nobody buys Infiniti.


There are exceptions. The Z has long outsold the Supra, possibly since the 60s (though Supra has taken hearts and minds...) and Toyota hasn’t had a GT-R competitor since its inception. But these markets don’t matter anymore, and if Nissan cares about them they’ve a funny way of showing it. I suppose Nissan had some ground with Skylines past, Toyota’s sedans never quite had the same appeal.

My question is this:

How can Nissan exist when their direct competitor seems to do better than them in every single segment? When it’s been happening for years? Who the hell would buy a Nissan?


It’s just not how competition works. They aren’t even competitive. They have no point of differentiation. They’re just worse Toyota.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter